I've been working with Victory Tax Law now for over 2 years and I couldn't be happier. It’s rare to find a firm that combines professionalism with genuine care, but they do. I can always count on them to do a stellar job because they've always had my best interests in mind.
Tax Attorney in Santa Clara County
Federal IRS and California state tax representation for Santa Clara County taxpayers across Silicon Valley — from San Jose to Cupertino, Mountain View to Palo Alto, Sunnyvale to Los Gatos. Our California Bar-admitted attorneys appear directly before the IRS, the Franchise Tax Board, CDTFA, EDD, the California Office of Tax Appeals, and the U.S. Tax Court, with petitions designated to the San Francisco trial city at 450 Golden Gate Avenue.
By Parham Khorsandi, Esq. — California Bar #266658. Admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. Last Reviewed: .
Request a Free Consultation
100% Free · Confidential · No Obligation
Cal Bar Admitted
Verifiable license #266658
U.S. Tax Court
San Francisco trial sessions
Silicon Valley Equity
RSU, ISO/AMT, QSBS, 83(b)
5.0 / 72 Reviews
Google Business Profile
Santa Clara County taxpayers facing IRS or FTB collection
If you live in San Jose, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Milpitas, or any of the 15 incorporated cities in Santa Clara County, you sit inside the densest tech-equity tax environment in the country. Apple, Google, NVIDIA, Cisco, Intel, AMD, eBay, Adobe, Netflix, LinkedIn, Synopsys, and Cadence all run their headquarters or major campuses inside county lines, and the resulting tide of RSU vests, ISO exercises, 83(b) elections, IPO secondary sales, and Section 1202 QSBS questions runs through every April 15. The H-1B and family-sponsored Indian, Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese populations across Cupertino, Fremont-adjacent Milpitas, and Sunnyvale carry significant FBAR and Form 8938 exposure under 31 USC §5314 and IRC §6038D. Departing-resident audits under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17014 pursue tech employees who move to Nevada, Texas, or Washington but keep a Saratoga or Los Altos Hills home. If you have an IRS or FTB balance, an audit notice, an FBAR letter, or an EDD assessment, this page walks through what Santa Clara representation looks like.
$100M+
Total tax relief secured
2,000+
Tax cases resolved
5.0
Average rating · 72 reviews
CA-Based
Los Angeles home office
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each tax case is unique and turns on individual facts and IRS or FTB discretion.
Why Santa Clara County tax matters require a California-licensed firm
Santa Clara County is the sixth-most-populous county in California and, by per-capita measure, the most federally-scrutinized for equity-compensation matters. The county hosts more Fortune 500 headquarters per square mile than any other in the United States: Apple in Cupertino, Alphabet in Mountain View, NVIDIA in Santa Clara, Cisco in San Jose, Adobe in San Jose, Intel in Santa Clara, AMD in Santa Clara, eBay in San Jose, Netflix in Los Gatos, Western Digital in San Jose, LinkedIn in Sunnyvale, Synopsys in Sunnyvale, and Cadence in San Jose. The tax fact-patterns that come with that concentration — RSU vest underwithholding, ISO Alternative Minimum Tax, 83(b) timing failures, IPO secondary-market sales, Section 1202 QSBS exclusions, and FBAR foreign-account reporting — do not exist at this density anywhere else.
Victory Tax Lawyers, LLP is a California-licensed tax-law firm. Both managing attorneys — Parham Khorsandi, Cal Bar #266658, and Amir Boroumand, Cal Bar #269570 — are members of the State Bar of California in active standing and admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. We represent Santa Clara County clients directly before the California Franchise Tax Board, CDTFA, EDD, and the California Office of Tax Appeals — no Power-of-Attorney workaround through out-of-state counsel, no referral chain.
On the federal side, our Tax Court bar admission has nationwide reach. A Santa Clara County petitioner most often designates the San Francisco trial city under Tax Court Rule 140, with sessions at 450 Golden Gate Avenue in the Phillip Burton Federal Building. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California sits in San Jose at the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building, 280 South 1st Street. The IRS operates a Taxpayer Assistance Center at 55 South Market Street in downtown San Jose, blocks from the courthouse.
The pages that follow lay out the practice areas, the venue map, settlement ranges from prior cases, the seven-step engagement process, and 12 FAQs answering what Santa Clara County taxpayers actually ask — particularly around equity compensation, FBAR, and post-move FTB residency audits.
Your tax rights as a Santa Clara County taxpayer
Federal taxpayer rights are codified across the Internal Revenue Code and summarized in IRS Publication 1. California layers its own rights through the FTB Taxpayer Bill of Rights at Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code Part 10.7 and parallel provisions for CDTFA and EDD. Foreign-account holders in the county — common given the H-1B and family-sponsored populations — pick up additional procedural rights under the Bank Secrecy Act and FATCA disclosure regimes.
Right to representation (federal)
Under IRC §7521(b)(2), an IRS examiner or collection officer must suspend an interview when you state you wish to consult an authorized representative. Form 2848 puts a tax attorney between you and the IRS for the remainder of the matter.
Right to representation (California)
FTB Form 3520-PIT or 3520-BE appoints counsel before the Franchise Tax Board. CDTFA Form 392 covers sales-tax matters; EDD DE 48 covers payroll. Once on file, every notice routes to your attorney.
Right to Collection Due Process
A Notice of Federal Tax Lien (IRC §6320) or Final Notice of Intent to Levy (IRC §6330) opens a 30-day window to request a CDP hearing on Form 12153. A timely CDP request pauses federal collection and preserves Tax Court review.
Right to U.S. Tax Court review
A Notice of Deficiency triggers a 90-day petition window under IRC §6213(a). Santa Clara County petitioners typically designate San Francisco as the place of trial, with sessions at 450 Golden Gate Avenue. Some calendars allow designation of San Jose Federal Building sessions when docket volume supports it.
Right to FBAR procedural fairness
FBAR penalties under 31 USC §5321 distinguish non-willful (capped per-account under Bittner v. United States) from willful (the greater of $100,000 inflation-adjusted or 50 percent of the high balance). Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures, the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice, and Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures each offer a path forward depending on the facts.
Right to a federal OIC
Under IRC §7122, the IRS may accept less than the full liability where doubt as to collectibility, doubt as to liability, or effective tax administration justifies settlement. Filed on Form 656 with Form 433-A(OIC) or 433-B(OIC).
Right to a California OIC
FTB compromise authority sits at Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19443. CDTFA runs a parallel offer program under §6832. EDD compromise sits at Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code §1735 and adjoining sections.
Right to a Collection Statute
IRC §6502 gives the IRS 10 years from assessment to collect. The California parallel under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19255 runs 20 years — double the federal tail. Pull both transcripts before negotiating.
How Victory Tax Lawyers helps Santa Clara County taxpayers
Federal & California Offer in Compromise
We file federal Form 656 with Form 433-A(OIC) under IRC §7122, and FTB Form 4905 PIT or BE with the parallel financial under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19443. The two reviews run on different Reasonable Collection Potential math, and California treats Santa Clara County real-estate equity (Palo Alto, Los Altos Hills, Saratoga, Monte Sereno, Los Gatos) tougher than the IRS does — among the highest median home values in the country.
Installment Agreements (IRS & FTB)
Streamlined IRS IAs under $50,000, Non-Streamlined IAs above with Form 433-F disclosure, and Partial Pay IAs under IRC §6159 running through the CSED. FTB parallel plans under Form 3567; CDTFA and EDD have their own structures. Common for tech employees whose RSU-vest balances cross six figures.
Lien release and withdrawal
A federal NFTL under IRC §6321 and FTB State Tax Liens under Cal. Gov. Code §7170 attach to Santa Clara County real property and are recorded with the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder. We pursue release after payment, certificate of discharge, subordination for refinance, and lien withdrawal under Fresh Start for IAs under $25,000.
Levy release (IRS, FTB, EDD)
Federal wage and bank levies under IRC §6331 stop with CNC, an accepted IA, OIC processing, or a timely CDP. FTB Earnings Withholding Orders under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §18670 and bank levies under §18670.5 release under analogous resolutions. Federal bank levies hold 21 days; FTB holds 10 business days.
Audit and exam defense
IRS correspondence, office, and field audits handled at the San Jose TAC. FTB residency audits under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17014 on tech employees relocating to Nevada, Texas, or Washington. CDTFA sales-tax audits on Santa Row retailers, Japantown restaurants, and Milpitas auto dealers. EDD AB 5 audits on contractor classification across staffing agencies and gig platforms headquartered locally.
Penalty abatement & FBAR resolution
Federal First-Time Penalty Abatement and reasonable-cause requests under IRC §6651. FTB waivers under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19131 and §19132. Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures for non-willful FBAR exposure; Voluntary Disclosure Practice where willfulness is in play.
Twelve tax issues we handle for Santa Clara County clients
Federal and California state practice areas framed for the matters that come through the door from San Jose, Cupertino, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, and the rest of Silicon Valley.
RSU vest underwithholding
Apple, Google, NVIDIA, Meta, Cisco, and Adobe withhold federal tax on RSU vests at the flat 22 percent supplemental rate (37 percent on wages above $1 million). California's 13.3 percent top bracket plus the Mental Health Services Act 1 percent surtax under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17043 bring the all-in marginal rate above 50 percent. April balances of $100,000 to $400,000 are routine.
ISO Alternative Minimum Tax
Pre-IPO and early-stage Santa Clara County employees who exercise Incentive Stock Options without selling create a preference item under IRC §55. The spread between strike and fair market value triggers AMT even when no cash changed hands. Disqualifying Dispositions, AMT credit carryforwards under IRC §53, and reasonable-cause penalty defense are the typical paths.
83(b) elections missed or late
A founder or early employee receives restricted stock and has 30 days under IRC §83(b) to elect to include the spread in income at grant. Missed elections result in ordinary income on each vest at the then-FMV. Late-election arguments under regulatory exceptions and reasonable-cause are narrow; we evaluate them carefully.
Section 1202 QSBS exclusions
Founders and early-employee shareholders of qualifying C-corp startups sold after five years can exclude up to $10 million or 10 times basis under IRC §1202. California does not conform — the full gain is California-taxable. The federal-state mismatch alone is worth careful planning before, during, and after the liquidity event.
IPO secondary-market sales
Tender offers and secondary sales on Forge, EquityZen, and direct buyback programs trigger ordinary income, capital gain, or wash-sale treatment depending on holding period and the QSBS overlay. We model the federal-California spread and structure quarterly estimates to avoid penalty.
FBAR foreign-account exposure
FinCEN Form 114 reports foreign financial accounts whose aggregate high balance exceeds $10,000 at any point in the calendar year. Common in Cupertino, Milpitas, and Sunnyvale among first-generation Indian, Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese taxpayers with family-overseas accounts. Streamlined Filing Compliance addresses non-willful gaps.
FTB departing-resident audits
Tech employees moving to Nevada, Texas, Washington, or Florida often trip the nine-factor domicile test under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17014. Retaining a Saratoga, Los Altos Hills, or Palo Alto home weighs heavily. We document driver's-license changes, voter registration, and physical-presence days under the 9-month presumption.
Mental Health Services Act surtax
California imposes an additional 1 percent surtax on taxable income above $1 million under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §17043. RSU-driven income spikes in Palo Alto, Los Altos Hills, and Saratoga cross the threshold routinely. Quarterly estimates often miss the surtax and the underpayment penalty stack adds up.
Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
Under IRC §6672, the IRS reaches owners of Santa Clara County startups, LLCs, and S-corps for unpaid payroll trust funds after Form 4180 interviews. EDD asserts the parallel state piece under Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code §1735. Common after a Series A wipes out reserves but founder draws continue.
EDD AB 5 worker-classification
Post-AB 5 and Prop 22, EDD reclassifies 1099 contractors under the ABC test. Common in Santa Clara County across staffing firms, gig platforms, software-development shops using overseas contractors, and consultancies serving tech clients.
Passport revocation defense
IRC §7345 certifications hit Silicon Valley executives traveling to India, China, Israel, and EU offices. We decertify before international travel and prevent enrollment-in-trusted-traveler suspensions.
U.S. Tax Court petitions
A 90-day petition in response to a Notice of Deficiency, typically designating San Francisco as the place of trial at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, or in some calendars San Jose Federal Building sessions.
Nine common causes of tax debt in Santa Clara County
1. RSU vest spikes
A Google or NVIDIA engineer in Mountain View or Santa Clara picks up a $400,000 RSU vest. Employer withholding at 22 percent supplemental covers federal but leaves a six-figure shortfall against the all-in 50-plus percent California top bracket.
2. ISO exercise without sale
An early-stage employee at a pre-IPO Sunnyvale company exercises Incentive Stock Options at a strike well below the 409A valuation, holds the shares, and triggers AMT on the paper spread. The company then has a down round and the shares are worth less than the AMT bill.
3. Missed 83(b) on restricted stock
A founder takes restricted stock at incorporation, forgets the 30-day §83(b) election window, and faces ordinary-income recognition at each vest as the company grows. By the Series B, the cumulative tax is several multiples of the cash they have on hand.
4. IPO and secondary sales
Lock-up expirations on a Palo Alto or San Jose IPO release tradable shares. Sales without quarterly estimate adjustments leave the federal and California balance unpaid until April. Penalties under IRC §6654 compound.
5. FBAR non-filing
An H-1B engineer in Cupertino keeps an Indian NRE/NRO account, a Chinese savings account inherited from parents, or a Korean retirement balance. The combined high-balance exceeds $10,000. FinCEN Form 114 was never filed because no one explained the rule. The IRS opens an FBAR exam.
6. FTB residency audit after move
A Netflix executive in Los Gatos sells, moves to Reno or Austin, but keeps a vacation home in Los Altos or sends children to Stanford. The FTB issues an information document request under §17014 and asserts continuing California domicile across three years.
7. Small-business payroll lapses
A San Jose restaurant on Santana Row or a Sunnyvale software services firm stops depositing Form 941 trust funds during a slow quarter. The IRS asserts TFRP under IRC §6672 against owners personally; EDD asserts the state side under Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code §1735.
8. ERC clawback exposure
Employee Retention Credit claims filed by promoter mills for Santa Clara County restaurants, dental practices, software consultancies, and hospitality groups are being clawed back through CP207 and CP207L letters.
9. Crypto and DeFi gains
Santa Clara County's overlap of tech-savvy taxpayers and Coinbase / Kraken usage produces unreported crypto activity. Wash-sale rules, staking income under Rev. Rul. 2023-14, and hard-fork events all trigger reporting events that get missed on consumer-grade tax software.
Who is on the hook: eight Santa Clara County liability scenarios
Joint filers (community-property state)
California is a community-property state under Cal. Fam. Code §760. Joint federal returns create joint-and-several liability under IRC §6013(d)(3). One spouse can be pursued for the entire balance — even post-divorce — subject to Innocent Spouse Relief under IRC §6015 and Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §18533.
Tech-equity divorces and tax allocation
Santa Clara County Superior Court at the Downtown Superior Court, 191 N. 1st Street, San Jose handles family-law dissolutions where unvested RSUs, ISO grants, and QSBS-eligible stock split between spouses. Allocation of joint federal liability and the timing of stock-related income recognition both shape outcomes. We coordinate with family-law counsel.
Responsible persons for payroll
TFRP under IRC §6672 reaches anyone with check-signing authority who willfully failed to pay over withheld taxes. Common across early-stage Santa Clara County startups where the founder, CFO, or fractional finance lead is on the hook personally. The California parallel sits at Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code §1735.
CDTFA dual-determinations
CDTFA can issue personal dual-determinations against corporate officers, directors, and LLC members for unremitted sales tax under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §6829. Common against SaaS founders who mis-sourced sales to taxable physical-product bundles.
FTB suspended-entity exposure
A Santa Clara County LLC or corporation suspended by FTB under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §23301 loses its right to contract or defend in California courts. Investors will not close a round on a suspended entity. Officers signing on behalf may incur personal exposure.
Transferee liability
IRC §6901 reaches transferees where the transfer rendered the transferor insolvent and tax debt remains. Common with Prop 19 parent-child transfers of Santa Clara County real property and family-LLC restructurings in Saratoga, Los Altos Hills, and Palo Alto estates.
Successor business liability
Asset purchases continuing a seller's Santa Clara County operation can carry CDTFA successor liability under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §6811-6814 and EDD successor liability under Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code §1731. Buyers in tech-asset deals protect with clearance letters and tax-indemnity provisions.
Estate and decedent returns
California has no state estate tax. The decedent's final 1040 and the estate's 1041 are the executor's responsibility, with personal liability under 31 USC §3713(b) for premature distributions. Santa Clara County Superior Court probate jurisdiction governs the priority of state-tax claims — significant given local real-estate values often pushing federal estate-tax filing thresholds.
What resolution can look like in Santa Clara County
Debt reduced
An accepted federal OIC settles the IRS liability for less than the full amount. A parallel FTB §19443 compromise can settle the California side. Partial Pay IAs cap recovery at what you can pay through the federal CSED or the FTB 20-year statute. Currently Not Collectible status freezes federal collection while finances stabilize after RSU bills, ISO assessments, or a down-round equity event.
Penalties abated
Federal First-Time Penalty Abatement removes failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties for a clean compliance year. Reasonable-cause requests address ISO-AMT surprise, FBAR ignorance, serious illness, and preparer reliance. FTB waivers under §19131 and §19132 follow parallel principles.
Liens and levies released
A federal NFTL recorded with the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder withdraws once a streamlined IA is in place under Fresh Start. FTB State Tax Liens release on payment, compromise, or release-for-cause. Wage and bank levies stop when the matter moves to CNC, IA, or OIC processing.
Outcomes vary. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each tax case is unique.
Settlement ranges from the firm's case files
The following ranges come from Victory Tax Lawyers cases over the past several years and contribute to the firm's $100M+ aggregate tax-relief figure. Names and identifying facts are removed for confidentiality.
| Matter type | Original liability | Resolution | Approximate result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Installment Agreement | $138,296 | IRC §6159 streamlined IA | $25/month accepted |
| Partial Pay IA | $126,489 | IRC §6159 PPIA through CSED | $50/month accepted |
| Installment Agreement | $128,206 | IRC §6159 streamlined IA | $25/month accepted |
| Partial Pay IA | $116,451 | IRC §6159 PPIA through CSED | $50/month accepted |
| Installment Agreement | $152,296 | IRC §6159 streamlined IA | $25/month accepted |
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each tax case is unique and turns on facts, asset position, monthly disposable income, IRS Allowable Living Expense tables, FTB equivalent standards, and the discretion of the assigned Revenue Officer, Settlement Officer, or FTB compromise reviewer. Acceptance rates for federal Offer in Compromise vary widely — the IRS reported a nationwide acceptance rate of roughly 30 to 40 percent in recent years.
Why work with a California-licensed firm on a Santa Clara County tax matter
A Santa Clara County tax matter rarely sits in a single forum. A federal RSU underwithholding bill at Apple, Google, or NVIDIA triggers a parallel California assessment within four years through the federal-state information-exchange agreement. An ISO-AMT case at a pre-IPO Sunnyvale company has both an IRS preference-item analysis and a California Schedule P recomputation. An FBAR exam on a Cupertino H-1B family pulls in FinCEN, the IRS Large Business and International division, and FTB notice through the federal-information feed. An FTB residency audit on a former Mountain View resident who moved to Reno usually pulls in Stanford-area property records from the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder and the Assessor. These matters do not stay in their lanes.
Victory Tax Lawyers is admitted in California, headquartered in Los Angeles, and built around this overlap. Parham Khorsandi (Cal Bar #266658) and Amir Boroumand (Cal Bar #269570) appear directly before the FTB, CDTFA, EDD, and OTA, and on the federal side before the IRS and the U.S. Tax Court. The same attorneys handle the whole engagement — no Form 2848 workaround, no referral chain through out-of-state counsel.
California Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1 governs lawyer advertising in the state. No superlatives without verifiable substantiation, no specific dollar guarantees, no testimonials without disclaimers. The firm operates under those rules natively. This page does not promise outcomes, does not advertise dollar averages, and does not list testimonials without context.
If your case is purely federal — an IRS audit, a Tax Court petition with San Francisco place of trial, an Offer in Compromise — we handle it under Tax Court bar admission, Circular 230, and a Form 2848 Power of Attorney. The California-licensed difference shows up when the state side appears, which it usually does for a Santa Clara County resident.
The seven steps of a VTL tax-resolution engagement
Free consultation
A 30-minute call with an attorney to outline the facts, the IRS or FTB notices received, and realistic resolution options.
Engagement letter
A written attorney-client agreement defines scope, fee, and authority. California-bar privilege and federal common-law privilege both attach.
Federal & state PoA
Form 2848 filed with the IRS, FTB Form 3520, CDTFA Form 392, or EDD DE 48 filed with the relevant California agency. Notices route to counsel.
Transcript investigation
IRS Account Transcripts, Wage-and-Income Transcripts, and Record of Account pulled across all open years. FTB MyFTB, CDTFA, and EDD records pulled. Federal CSED and California 20-year statute dates verified.
Strategy memo
A written analysis recommending federal OIC, IA, CNC, audit response, CDP, FBAR streamlined filing, or Tax Court petition with the FTB, CDTFA, or EDD parallel strategy where applicable.
Resolution filed
Federal Forms 656, 433-A, 9423, 12153, or Tax Court Petition. State FTB Form 4905, CDTFA offer, or EDD compromise. Negotiations with Revenue Officers, Settlement Officers, Appeals Officers, FTB analysts, CDTFA supervisors, and OTA hearings handled directly.
Compliance close-out
Post-resolution monitoring: quarterly estimates calibrated for RSU vests, return filings, FBAR going-forward compliance, and protection against IA default. The case is done when the new pattern is stable, not when the offer is accepted.
Collection statute warning — the California 20-year tail
Under IRC §6502(a), the IRS has ten years from the date of assessment to collect. After the federal Collection Statute Expiration Date, the debt becomes uncollectible by operation of law. Tolling events extend the federal CSED: a pending OIC (extends by OIC pendency plus 30 days), bankruptcy (extends by stay plus six months), Collection Due Process hearings, Innocent Spouse claims, and continuous absence from the United States for six months or more — which catches Santa Clara County executives on extended international assignments to India, China, Ireland, or Israel offices.
The California side is the opposite of forgiving. Under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19255, the FTB has 20 years from the latest of assessment, due date, or final return filing to collect. That is double the federal CSED. CDTFA collection runs 10 years under §6711 with similar tolling. EDD operates under its own collection window in the Unemployment Insurance Code.
A federal balance assessed in 2016 may approach CSED expiration in 2026, while the FTB equivalent continues to be collectible until 2036. Submitting a federal OIC restarts the federal clock. Sometimes a Partial Pay IA that runs out the federal statute is the better federal play, paired with a separate FTB compromise to address the longer state tail. The two strategies are decided together.
Santa Clara County venue: federal and state tax forums
A Santa Clara County tax matter may proceed in any of several federal or state forums depending on the type of liability. Below are the offices, courthouses, and agencies serving the county.
U.S. Tax Court — San Francisco trial sessions
The United States Tax Court holds the San Francisco trial sessions serving Santa Clara County at the Phillip Burton Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco CA 94102. A Santa Clara County petitioner designates "San Francisco, California" as the place of trial on the petition under Tax Court Rule 140. Some calendars hear at the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building in San Jose when docket volume supports it.
IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center — San Jose
The IRS operates a TAC at 55 South Market Street, San Jose CA 95113, blocks from the U.S. District Court and the Santa Clara County Superior Court. Appointments through apps.irs.gov/app/office-locator or 844-545-5640.
U.S. District Court (Northern District of CA)
Federal refund suits and criminal-tax cases proceed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, at the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose CA 95113. Appellate review goes to the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco.
Santa Clara County Superior Court
State-tax civil collection actions and probate-tax matters proceed at the Santa Clara County Superior Court Downtown Superior Court, 191 N. 1st Street, San Jose CA 95113. The court also hears the family-law matters that intersect with joint federal liability allocation and tech-equity division.
SC County Tax Collector
The Santa Clara County Department of Tax and Collections handles property-tax billing and collection at 70 W. Hedding Street, East Wing, 6th Floor, San Jose CA 95110. Property-tax delinquencies on Palo Alto, Saratoga, Los Altos Hills, and Los Gatos real estate proceed through this office.
SC County Assessor
The Santa Clara County Assessor at 70 W. Hedding Street, East Wing, 5th Floor, San Jose CA 95110 administers property valuation under Prop 13 and Prop 19. The Clerk-Recorder, in the same complex, records federal NFTLs and FTB State Tax Liens against Santa Clara County real property.
California FTB San Jose field office
The California Franchise Tax Board operates a San Jose-area field office. We appear there on residency audits, Notice of Action protests, and FTB compromise filings under Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §19443. Many Santa Clara County matters are managed through the FTB centralized teams in Sacramento with field-office support as needed.
Cities & service area
Santa Clara County contains 15 incorporated cities: San Jose (county seat), Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Mountain View, Milpitas, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Gilroy, Campbell, Morgan Hill, Saratoga, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, and Los Altos Hills. Unincorporated areas include Stanford, Alum Rock, and the South County wineries near Gilroy. We represent clients across all of them.
Request a free consultation with a Santa Clara County tax attorney
A 30-minute call with an attorney costs nothing. Bring your most recent IRS notice, last filed federal and California returns, any FTB or CDTFA or EDD correspondence, and — if equity is in play — recent grant statements, vest schedules, 3921 / 3922 forms, and W-2 box-12 entries. We will tell you which resolution options fit your facts on both sides before you sign anything.
Principal office: 1100 S. Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90035. Statewide California service including all 15 cities of Santa Clara County.
Frequently asked questions — Santa Clara County
Reviewed by
Parham Khorsandi, Esq.
Managing Attorney · California Bar #266658 · Admitted to the United States Tax Court
Parham Khorsandi is the managing attorney of Victory Tax Lawyers, LLP, headquartered at 1100 S. Robertson Boulevard in Los Angeles. His practice covers federal and California tax controversy across the state, including Santa Clara County matters: RSU vest underwithholding cases at Apple, Google, NVIDIA, Cisco, Adobe, and Meta employees; ISO and AMT defenses for pre-IPO Sunnyvale, Mountain View, and Palo Alto employees; Section 1202 QSBS planning for founders and early employees; 83(b) timing and post-miss mitigation; FBAR streamlined filings for first-generation Cupertino, Milpitas, and Sunnyvale residents with foreign accounts; FTB residency audits after moves to Nevada, Texas, and Washington; CDTFA sales-tax audits on Santana Row and Japantown restaurants; EDD AB 5 audits on software consultancies and staffing firms; and U.S. Tax Court petitions designated to the San Francisco trial city.
Last Reviewed:
Attorney Advertising. Victory Tax Lawyers, LLP is a California-licensed law firm with its principal office at 1100 S. Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90035. Information on this page is general in nature, may not reflect the most recent legal developments, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This page is not legal advice. Federal and California tax outcomes depend on individual facts and the discretion of the Internal Revenue Service, the Franchise Tax Board, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the Employment Development Department, or the relevant tribunal. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each tax matter is unique.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure. To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, any U.S. federal tax advice contained on this page is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Equity-compensation and FBAR note. VTL attorneys are members of the State Bar of California in active standing. California state-tax matters (FTB, CDTFA, EDD, OTA) and federal IRS / U.S. Tax Court matters are handled directly by the firm. Equity-compensation outcomes turn on grant documents, vesting schedules, 3921 / 3922 / W-2 reporting, and timing decisions that should be made with counsel before action is taken. FBAR and Form 8938 exposure is addressed through Streamlined Filing Compliance, the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice, or Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures depending on the facts and willfulness analysis. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation before acting on any content on this page. The State Bar of California Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1 requires that lawyer communications not be false or misleading; this page strives to comply and does not promise specific outcomes.
Related VTL practice areas
Offer in Compromise
IRC §7122 settlement
Installment Agreement
IRC §6159 payment plan
Tax Lien
IRC §6321 release
Tax Levy
IRC §6331 release
Audit Representation
IRS exam defense
Penalty Abatement
First-Time and reasonable cause
Back Taxes
Unfiled returns and balances
California Tax Attorney
State hub — all 58 counties